Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of Upstage: Solar Pro 4, Google: Gemini 4 Argon
2 modelsupstageUpstage: Solar Pro 4Remove ×googleGoogle: Gemini 4 ArgonRemove ×
What’s differentSolar Pro 4 is Upstage's cost-efficient large language model, featuring a 524K context window. It is built for long-horizon tasks and agentic workflows, with strong capabilities in office productivity,…Long decode can use the unified 1M-token budget for output; reads video, audio and PDFs, with implicit-only caching.
DateAug 10, 2026ListedSep 30, 2026Released
Listed rate$0.09 in / $0.36 out/ 1M tokensUpstage · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗upstage/zdr$1.00 in / $5.00 out/ 1M tokensGoogle AI Studio · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗google-ai-studio/flex · tier=flex
Provider endpoints3 endpoints →8 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reported52.56 ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reported1,486.44 ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reported1,623.99 ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported77.51% ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reported57.07% ↗Effort: high · HighHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported61.81% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: high · HighIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported57.09% ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported21.8% ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported27.14% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: high · HighIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported42.35 ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reported79.67% ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported84.1% ↗Effort: high · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported73.7% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported83.1% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported92% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported89.7% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported69.9% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported85.2% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported95.1% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
Context window524.3K1M
Max output131.1K65.5K
Parameters——
Tool callingSupportedSupported
Structured outputSupportedSupported
Image inputNot reportedSupported
Audio inputNot reportedSupported
Video inputNot reportedSupported
ReasoningSupportedSupported
Prompt cachingSupportedSupported

Add another model

Search all models →