Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of Perplexity: Sonar, Ideogram V4.5 Edit, OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol
3 modelsperplexityPerplexity: SonarRemove ×ideogramIdeogram V4.5 EditRemove ×openaiOpenAI: GPT-6.1 SolRemove ×
What’s differentSonar is lightweight, affordable, fast, and simple to use — now featuring citations and the ability to customize sources. It is designed for companies seeking to integrate lightweight question-and-answer…Mask-guided edits with a high-precision mode that restores unchanged pixels; combines a source image with extra references.Requires Responses API for tools; offers Ultrafast inference with US or EU data residency.
DateJan 27, 2025ListedSep 30, 2026ListedSep 29, 2026Released
Listed rate$1.00 in / $1.00 out/ 1M tokensPerplexity · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗perplexitySee provider quotes$2.00 in / $10.00 out/ 1M tokensExperiential · all routes ↗Standard list rate
Provider endpoints2 endpoints →0 endpoints →10 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reportedNot reported51.83 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported1,557 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reportedNot reported1,593.85 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported64.87% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reportedNot reported56.06% ↗Effort: max · MaxHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported54.17% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · MaxIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported52.92% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported31% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported31.71% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · MaxIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported41.53 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported83% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported85.41% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported82.1% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported83.5% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported88% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported96% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported73% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported82.7% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported92.6% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
Context window127.1K—1.1M
Max output114.4K—128K
Parameters———
Tool callingNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Structured outputNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Image inputSupportedNot reportedSupported
ReasoningNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Prompt cachingNot reportedNot reportedSupported

Add another model

Search all models →