Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of Morph: Morph V3 Large, Cloudflare: Clef Flash, OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna
3 modelsmorphMorph: Morph V3 LargeRemove ×cloudflareCloudflare: Clef FlashRemove ×openaiOpenAI: GPT-6 LunaRemove ×
What’s differentMorph's high-accuracy apply model for complex code edits. ~4,500 tokens/sec with 98% accuracy for precise code transformations. The model requires the prompt to be in the following format: {instruction}…Small decision model for routing and scoring; the Workers AI route currently reads only roughly the first 2K text-state tokens.Can turn reasoning off for high-volume requests; Chat Completions tool calls require reasoning_effort=none.
DateJul 7, 2025ListedOct 1, 2026ListedSep 22, 2026Released
Listed rate$0.90 in / $1.90 out/ 1M tokensMorph · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗morph/fp8 · quantization=fp8$0.038 in / $0.00 out/ 1M tokensDeepInfra · all routes ↗$0.10 in / $0.50 out/ 1M tokensAzure · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗azure · prompt ≤ 272000 tokens
Provider endpoints2 endpoints →2 endpoints →9 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reportedNot reported38.12 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported1,334.83 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reportedNot reported1,431.86 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported53.17% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reportedNot reported12.63% ↗Effort: max · MaxHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported54.63% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · MaxIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported38.51% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported22.8% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported19.43% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · MaxIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported0.65 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported83.33% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported69.4% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported82.5% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported43.5% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported72% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported84.5% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported48.1% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported73.4% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported81.8% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
Context window262.1K24.6K1.1M
Max output131.1K22.1K128K
Parameters———
Tool callingNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Structured outputSupportedNot reportedSupported
Image inputNot reportedSupportedSupported
ReasoningNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Prompt cachingNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Open weightsNot reportedSupportedNot reported

Add another model

Search all models →