Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of Morph: Morph V3 Fast, Elorian: Glimpse, Google: Gemini 4 Argon
3 modelsmorphMorph: Morph V3 FastRemove ×elorianElorian: GlimpseRemove ×googleGoogle: Gemini 4 ArgonRemove ×
What’s differentMorph's fastest apply model for code edits. ~10,500 tokens/sec with 96% accuracy for rapid code transformations. The model requires the prompt to be in the following format: {instruction} {initial_code}…Glimpse is a multimodal visual reasoning model from Elorian, built for visual understanding and complex visual reasoning in the physical world. It reasons directly over images and video rather than...Long decode can use the unified 1M-token budget for output; reads video, audio and PDFs, with implicit-only caching.
DateJul 7, 2025ListedOct 17, 2026ListedSep 30, 2026Released
Listed rate$0.80 in / $1.20 out/ 1M tokensMorph · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗morph/fp8 · quantization=fp8$0.60 in / $3.00 out/ 1M tokensTogether · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗together$1.00 in / $5.00 out/ 1M tokensGoogle AI Studio · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗google-ai-studio/flex · tier=flex
Provider endpoints2 endpoints →2 endpoints →8 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reportedNot reported52.56 ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported1,485.76 ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reportedNot reported1,623.11 ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported77.51% ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reportedNot reported57.07% ↗Effort: high · HighHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported61.81% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: high · HighIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported57.09% ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported21.8% ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported27.14% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: high · HighIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported42.35 ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported79.67% ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported84.1% ↗Effort: high · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported73.7% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported83.1% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported92% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported89.7% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported69.9% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported85.2% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported95.1% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
Context window262.1K262.1K1M
Max output131.1K256K943.7K
Parameters———
Tool callingNot reportedSupportedSupported
Structured outputSupportedSupportedSupported
Image inputNot reportedSupportedSupported
Audio inputNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Video inputNot reportedSupportedSupported
ReasoningNot reportedSupportedSupported
Prompt cachingNot reportedSupportedSupported

Add another model

Search all models →