Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash, Ideogram V4.5 Edit, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5
3 modelsgoogleGoogle: Gemini 3.7 FlashRemove ×ideogramIdeogram V4.5 EditRemove ×anthropicAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5Remove ×
What’s differentGemini 3.7 Flash is a multimodal model from Google for fast agentic workflows, coding, and complex multi-step reasoning. It is designed for tasks that require responsive performance and reliable multi-step...Mask-guided edits with a high-precision mode that restores unchanged pixels; combines a source image with extra references.Tuned for quick iteration on scoped fixes and documents; Anthropic favors Opus 5.5 for open-ended work needing sustained judgment.
DateAug 13, 2026ListedSep 30, 2026ListedSep 28, 2026Released
Listed rate$0.375 in / $1.875 out/ 1M tokensGoogle AI Studio · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗google-ai-studio/flex · tier=flexSee provider quotes$2.00 in / $10.00 out/ 1M tokensAmazon Bedrock · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗amazon-bedrock
Provider endpoints10 endpoints →0 endpoints →11 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reportedNot reported56 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported1,817.26 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reportedNot reported1,837.82 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported71.77% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reportedNot reported63.64% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported61% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported54.96% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported25.8% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported31.43% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported32.3 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported82.67% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported82.46% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported85% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported83.6% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported84% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported94.7% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported78.8% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported59.5% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported91.6% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
Context window1M—1M
Max output65.5K—128K
Parameters———
Tool callingSupportedNot reportedSupported
Structured outputSupportedNot reportedSupported
Image inputSupportedNot reportedSupported
Audio inputSupportedNot reportedNot reported
Video inputSupportedNot reportedNot reported
ReasoningSupportedNot reportedSupported
Prompt cachingSupportedNot reportedSupported

Add another model

Search all models →