Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5
2 modelsgoogleGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewRemove ×anthropicAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5Remove ×
What’s differentGemini 3.1 Pro Preview is Google’s frontier reasoning model, delivering enhanced software engineering performance, improved agentic reliability, and more efficient token usage across complex workflows.…Tuned for quick iteration on scoped fixes and documents; Anthropic favors Opus 5.5 for open-ended work needing sustained judgment.
DateFeb 19, 2026ListedSep 28, 2026Released
Listed rate$1.00 in / $6.00 out/ 1M tokensGoogle · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗google-vertex/global/flex · tier=flex · prompt ≤ 200000 tokens$2.00 in / $10.00 out/ 1M tokensAmazon Bedrock · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗amazon-bedrock
Provider endpoints8 endpoints →11 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reported56 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reported1,817.26 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reported1,837.82 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported71.77% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reported63.64% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported61% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported54.96% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported25.8% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported31.43% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported32.3 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reported82.67% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported82.46% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported85% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported83.6% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported84% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported94.7% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported78.8% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported59.5% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported91.6% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
Context window1M1M
Max output65.5K128K
Parameters——
Tool callingSupportedSupported
Structured outputSupportedSupported
Image inputSupportedSupported
Audio inputSupportedNot reported
Video inputSupportedNot reported
ReasoningSupportedSupported
Prompt cachingSupportedSupported

Add another model

Search all models →