Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of Cohere: Command A+, MiniMax-M3, Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B
3 modelscohereCohere: Command A+Remove ×MiniMaxAIMiniMax-M3Remove ×reflectionReflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23BRemove ×
What’s differentCommand A+ is Cohere's flagship model for enterprise agentic workflows. It accepts text and image inputs with a 192K context window, supports native tool calling with strict tool schemas, structured...MiniMax-M3 is a native multimodal model with 1M context. It has ~428B parameters and ~23B activated parameters.Apache-2.0 text model with 501B total and 23B active parameters; ships BF16, FP8 and NVFP4 weights.
DateSep 22, 2026ListedJun 2, 2026ListedOct 16, 2026Released
Listed rate$0.30 in / $1.50 out/ 1M tokensCohere · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗cohere$0.28 in / $1.10 out/ 1M tokensdeepinfra · via Hugging Face · all routes ↗$0.25 in / $1.00 out/ 1M tokensNebius · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗nebius/fp8 · quantization=fp8
Provider endpoints2 endpoints →7 endpoints →5 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reportedNot reported30.33 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported976.2 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reportedNot reported1,177.08 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported48.46% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reportedNot reported3.03% ↗Effort not specifiedHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported48.5% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort not specifiedIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported34.66% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported11.6% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported13.14% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort not specifiedIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported1.5 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported78% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported55.5% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported67.9% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported72.8% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported0% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported83.9% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported17.3% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported66.4% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported80.2% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
Context window192K1M1M
Max output64K—943.7K
Parameters——501B
Tool callingSupportedSupportedSupported
Structured outputSupportedSupportedSupported
Image inputSupportedSupportedNot reported
ReasoningSupportedNot reportedSupported
Prompt cachingSupportedNot reportedSupported
Open weightsNot reportedSupportedSupported

Add another model

Search all models →