Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of Cohere: Command A+, LiquidAI: LFM2.5-24B-A2B, OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol
3 modelscohereCohere: Command A+Remove ×liquidLiquidAI: LFM2.5-24B-A2BRemove ×openaiOpenAI: GPT-6.1 SolRemove ×
What’s differentCommand A+ is Cohere's flagship model for enterprise agentic workflows. It accepts text and image inputs with a 192K context window, supports native tool calling with strict tool schemas, structured...24B total, 2.45B active parameters; always reasons before answering, with GGUF and MLX releases for local deployment.Requires Responses API for tools; offers Ultrafast inference with US or EU data residency.
DateSep 22, 2026ListedOct 13, 2026ListedSep 29, 2026Released
Listed rate$0.30 in / $1.50 out/ 1M tokensCohere · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗cohere$0.05 in / $0.70 out/ 1M tokensLiquid · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗liquid/fp8 · quantization=fp8$2.00 in / $10.00 out/ 1M tokensExperiential · all routes ↗Standard list rate
Provider endpoints2 endpoints →2 endpoints →10 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reportedNot reported51.83 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported1,557 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reportedNot reported1,593.85 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported64.87% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reportedNot reported56.06% ↗Effort: max · MaxHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported54.17% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · MaxIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported52.92% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported31% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported31.71% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · MaxIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported41.53 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported83% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported85.41% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported82.1% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported83.5% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported88% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported96% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported73% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported82.7% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported92.6% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
Context window192K128K1.1M
Max output64K8.2K128K
Parameters—24B—
Tool callingSupportedSupportedSupported
Structured outputSupportedSupportedSupported
Image inputSupportedNot reportedSupported
ReasoningSupportedSupportedSupported
Prompt cachingSupportedSupportedSupported
Open weightsNot reportedSupportedNot reported

Add another model

Search all models →