Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5, Ming-Image-0.1-Design
2 modelsanthropicAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5Remove ×inclusionAIMing-Image-0.1-DesignRemove ×
What’s differentTuned for quick iteration on scoped fixes and documents; Anthropic favors Opus 5.5 for open-ended work needing sustained judgment.Design-native, open-weight text-to-image (6B) — ranked #1 among open-weight models on Artificial Analysis's UI/UX Design leaderboard. Renders legible UI and poster text plus cohesive graphics, illustration…
DateSep 28, 2026ReleasedSep 22, 2026Released
Listed rate$2.00 in / $10.00 out/ 1M tokensAmazon Bedrock · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗amazon-bedrockSee provider quotes
Provider endpoints11 endpoints →0 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.256 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent resultNot reported
AA-Briefcase ↗1.11,817.26 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent resultNot reported
GDPval-AA ↗2.11,837.82 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent resultNot reported
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection71.77% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent resultNot reported
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗63.64% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackHarness unreportedIndependent resultNot reported
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection61% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent resultNot reported
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection54.96% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent resultNot reported
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection25.8% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent resultNot reported
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection31.43% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent resultNot reported
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection32.3 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent resultNot reported
AA-LCR ↗1.182.67% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent resultNot reported
AA Image ↗2.1Not reported999.01 ↗Text-to-image · all categoriesIndependent result95% CI 990.01–1,008.01 · n=20,241
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)82.46% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)85% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)83.6% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)84% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)94.7% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)78.8% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)59.5% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)91.6% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent resultNot reported
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Parameters——
Tool callingSupportedNot reported
Structured outputSupportedNot reported
Image inputSupportedNot reported
ReasoningSupportedNot reported
Prompt cachingSupportedNot reported
Open weightsNot reportedSupported

Add another model

Search all models →