Side by side
See the difference.
Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.
Scroll to compare models →
| 2 models | anthropicAnthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch)Remove × | NVIDIANemotron 3.5 Super VLRemove × |
|---|---|---|
| What’s different | Claude Opus 5 is Anthropic’s flagship model for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work. It is particularly strong at end-to-end software tasks, code review and bug finding, visual… | 120B/12B-active Mamba-2 hybrid with a vision encoder; native speculative decoding and switchable thinking. |
| Date | Jul 24, 2026Listed | Oct 15, 2026Released |
API prices USD · provider configuration shown below | ||
| Listed rate | $2.50 in / $12.50 out/ 1M tokensAnthropic · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗anthropic | See provider quotes |
| Provider endpoints | 2 endpoints → | 0 endpoints → |
Benchmarks Each result retains its evaluation configuration | ||
| AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2 | Not reported | 26.49 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result |
| AA-Briefcase ↗1.1 | Not reported | 998.76 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result |
| GDPval-AA ↗2.1 | Not reported | 1,162.41 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result |
| AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection | Not reported | 14.82% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗ | Not reported | 0% ↗Effort not specifiedHarness unreportedIndependent result |
| SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection | Not reported | 47.8% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort not specifiedIndependent result |
| Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection | Not reported | 30.72% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result |
| GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection | Not reported | 8% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result |
| CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection | Not reported | 10.57% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort not specifiedIndependent result |
| AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection | Not reported | -4.22 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result |
| AA-LCR ↗1.1 | Not reported | 69% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result |
| LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02) | Not reported | 51.47% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result |
| LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02) | Not reported | 60.7% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result |
| LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02) | Not reported | 70.9% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result |
| LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02) | Not reported | 4% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result |
| LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02) | Not reported | 65.5% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result |
| LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02) | Not reported | 15.8% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result |
| LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02) | Not reported | 64.6% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result |
| LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02) | Not reported | 78.8% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result |
Specifications | ||
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Parameters | — | 120B |
| Tool calling | Supported | Not reported |
| Structured output | Supported | Not reported |
| Image input | Supported | Supported |
| Reasoning | Supported | Supported |
| Prompt caching | Supported | Not reported |
| Open weights | Not reported | Supported |