Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of Amazon: Nova Premier 1.0, VEED Clean Audio, Meta: Muse Spark Open
3 modelsamazonAmazon: Nova Premier 1.0Remove ×veedVEED Clean AudioRemove ×metaMeta: Muse Spark OpenRemove ×
What’s differentAmazon Nova Premier is the most capable of Amazon’s multimodal models for complex reasoning tasks and for use as the best teacher for distilling custom models.Studio-quality speech from noisy recordingsOpenRouter lists a 1,048,576-token context and up to 943,718 output tokens for this open-weight model aimed at agentic coding.
DateOct 31, 2025ListedSep 21, 2026ListedOct 15, 2026Released
Listed rateSee provider quotesSee provider quotes$1.25 in / $4.25 out/ 1M tokensbaseten · via Hugging Face · all routes ↗
Provider endpoints2 endpoints →0 endpoints →8 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reportedNot reported38.87 ↗Effort: xhigh · XhighIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported1,279.37 ↗Effort: xhigh · XhighIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reportedNot reported1,401.12 ↗Effort: xhigh · XhighIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported49.71% ↗Effort: xhigh · XhighIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reportedNot reported8.08% ↗Effort: xhigh · XhighHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported58.45% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: xhigh · XhighIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported43.88% ↗Effort: xhigh · XhighIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported18.6% ↗Effort: xhigh · XhighIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported14.86% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: xhigh · XhighIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported24.65 ↗Effort: xhigh · XhighIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported78.33% ↗Effort: xhigh · XhighIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported57.57% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported60.3% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported80.3% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported36% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported73.6% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported18.9% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported60.2% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported73.7% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
Context window1M—1M
Max output32K—943.7K
Parameters———
Tool callingSupportedNot reportedSupported
Structured outputNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Image inputSupportedNot reportedSupported
Audio inputNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Video inputNot reportedNot reportedSupported
ReasoningNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Prompt cachingSupportedNot reportedSupported
Open weightsNot reportedNot reportedSupported

Add another model

Search all models →