Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of GLM-5.3-Flash, Thinking Machines: Inkling
2 modelszai-orgGLM-5.3-FlashRemove ×thinkingmachinesThinking Machines: InklingRemove ×
What’s differentGLM-5.3-Flash is a native multimodal model from Z.ai. It is suited for efficient coding and long-horizon agent tasks. Its hybrid sparse and linear attention architecture maintains accurate long-context…Inkling is an open-weight multimodal mixture-of-experts model from Thinking Machines Lab, with 41B active parameters out of 975B total. It is designed for general-purpose reasoning, coding, agentic and…
DateAug 26, 2026ReleasedJul 15, 2026Released
Listed rate$0.048 in / $0.20 out/ 1M tokensOpenInference · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗open-inference/fp4 · quantization=fp4$0.95 in / $4.05 out/ 1M tokensdeepinfra · via Hugging Face · all routes ↗
Provider endpoints46 endpoints →6 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.241.81 ↗Effort: maxIndependent result24.98 ↗Effort: xhigh · XhighIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.11,452.63 ↗Effort: maxIndependent result832.43 ↗Effort: xhigh · XhighIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.11,642.18 ↗Effort: maxIndependent result1,076.19 ↗Effort: xhigh · XhighIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection60.37% ↗Effort: maxIndependent result4.98% ↗Effort: xhigh · XhighIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗32.83% ↗Effort: maxHarness unreportedIndependent result1.01% ↗Effort: xhigh · XhighHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection51.62% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: maxIndependent result46.99% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: xhigh · XhighIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection39.85% ↗Effort: maxIndependent result31.88% ↗Effort: xhigh · XhighIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection15.4% ↗Effort: maxIndependent result12.8% ↗Effort: xhigh · XhighIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection15.43% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: maxIndependent result5.43% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: xhigh · XhighIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection7.47 ↗Effort: maxIndependent result2 ↗Effort: xhigh · XhighIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.180% ↗Effort: maxIndependent result77.33% ↗Effort: xhigh · XhighIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)70.61% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)77.2% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)70.1% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)84% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)80.6% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)28.4% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)76.4% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)77.6% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent resultNot reported
Context window1M1M
Max output943.7K471.9K
Parameters——
Tool callingSupportedSupported
Structured outputSupportedSupported
Image inputSupportedSupported
Audio inputNot reportedSupported
Video inputSupportedNot reported
ReasoningSupportedSupported
Prompt cachingSupportedSupported
Open weightsSupportedSupported

Add another model

Search all models →