Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of Z.ai: GLM 5.1, Moondream: Moondream 3 Preview, Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B
3 modelsz-aiZ.ai: GLM 5.1Remove ×moondreamMoondream: Moondream 3 PreviewRemove ×reflectionReflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23BRemove ×
What’s differentGLM-5.1 delivers a major leap in coding capability, with particularly significant gains in handling long-horizon tasks. Unlike previous models built around minute-level interactions, GLM-5.1 can work…Moondream 3 Preview is a vision-language model from Moondream with 9B total parameters and 2B active (mixture-of-experts). It handles visual question answering, captioning, OCR, and visual reasoning over…Apache-2.0 text model with 501B total and 23B active parameters; ships BF16, FP8 and NVFP4 weights.
DateApr 3, 2026ListedOct 15, 2026ListedOct 16, 2026Released
Listed rate$0.966 in / $3.036 out/ 1M tokensExperiential · all routes ↗Standard list rate$0.30 in / $2.50 out/ 1M tokensPrimeIntellect · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗primeintellect/fp8 · quantization=fp8$0.25 in / $1.00 out/ 1M tokensNebius · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗nebius/fp8 · quantization=fp8
Provider endpoints17 endpoints →2 endpoints →6 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reportedNot reported30.33 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported976.2 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reportedNot reported1,177.08 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported48.46% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reportedNot reported3.03% ↗Effort not specifiedHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported48.5% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort not specifiedIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported34.66% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported11.6% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported13.14% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort not specifiedIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported1.5 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported78% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported55.5% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported67.9% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported72.8% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported0% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported83.9% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported17.3% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported66.4% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported80.2% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
Context window204.8K32K1M
Max output131.1K4.1K943.7K
Parameters——501B
Tool callingSupportedNot reportedSupported
Structured outputSupportedNot reportedSupported
Image inputNot reportedSupportedNot reported
ReasoningSupportedSupportedSupported
Prompt cachingSupportedNot reportedSupported
Open weightsSupportedSupportedSupported

Add another model

Search all models →