Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of Z.ai: GLM 4.5V, Tripo3D Segment, Google: Gemini 4 Argon
3 modelsz-aiZ.ai: GLM 4.5VRemove ×tripo3dTripo3D SegmentRemove ×googleGoogle: Gemini 4 ArgonRemove ×
What’s differentGLM-4.5V is a vision-language foundation model for multimodal agent applications. Built on a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 106B parameters and 12B activated parameters, it achieves…Automatically splits a 3D model into semantic parts for editing, texturing, and rigging.Long decode can use the unified 1M-token budget for output; reads video, audio and PDFs, with implicit-only caching.
DateAug 10, 2025ListedAug 6, 2026ListedSep 30, 2026Released
Listed rate$0.60 in / $1.80 out/ 1M tokensnovita · via Hugging Face · all routes ↗See provider quotes$1.00 in / $5.00 out/ 1M tokensGoogle AI Studio · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗google-ai-studio/flex · tier=flex
Provider endpoints5 endpoints →0 endpoints →8 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reportedNot reported52.56 ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported1,485.76 ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reportedNot reported1,623.11 ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported77.51% ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reportedNot reported57.07% ↗Effort: high · HighHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported61.81% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: high · HighIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported57.09% ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported21.8% ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported27.14% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: high · HighIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported42.35 ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported79.67% ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported84.1% ↗Effort: high · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported73.7% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported83.1% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported92% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported89.7% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported69.9% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported85.2% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported95.1% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
Context window65.5K—1M
Max output16.4K—943.7K
Parameters———
Tool callingSupportedNot reportedSupported
Structured outputSupportedNot reportedSupported
Image inputSupportedNot reportedSupported
Audio inputNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Video inputNot reportedNot reportedSupported
ReasoningSupportedNot reportedSupported
Prompt cachingSupportedNot reportedSupported
Open weightsSupportedNot reportedNot reported

Add another model

Search all models →