Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash, StepFun: Step 3.5 Flash, OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol
3 modelsstepfunStepFun: Step 3.7 FlashRemove ×stepfunStepFun: Step 3.5 FlashRemove ×openaiOpenAI: GPT-6.1 SolRemove ×
What’s differentStep 3.7 Flash is StepFun's latest high-efficiency multimodal Mixture-of-Experts model. It pairs a 196B-parameter language backbone with a vision encoder for native image and video understanding, activating…Step 3.5 Flash is StepFun's most capable open-source foundation model. Built on a sparse Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture, it selectively activates only 11B of its 196B parameters per token....Requires Responses API for tools; offers Ultrafast inference with US or EU data residency.
DateMay 23, 2026ListedJan 29, 2026ListedSep 29, 2026Released
Listed rate$0.20 in / $1.15 out/ 1M tokensdeepinfra · via Hugging Face · all routes ↗$0.10 in / $0.30 out/ 1M tokensdeepinfra · via Hugging Face · all routes ↗$2.00 in / $10.00 out/ 1M tokensExperiential · all routes ↗Standard list rate
Provider endpoints5 endpoints →4 endpoints →10 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reportedNot reported51.83 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported1,557 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reportedNot reported1,593.85 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported64.87% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reportedNot reported56.06% ↗Effort: max · MaxHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported54.17% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · MaxIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported52.92% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported31% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported31.71% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · MaxIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported41.53 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported83% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported85.41% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported82.1% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported83.5% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported88% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported96% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported73% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported82.7% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported92.6% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
Context window262.1K262.1K1.1M
Max output230.4K65.5K128K
Parameters———
Tool callingSupportedSupportedSupported
Structured outputSupportedSupportedSupported
Image inputSupportedNot reportedSupported
Video inputSupportedNot reportedNot reported
ReasoningSupportedSupportedSupported
Prompt cachingSupportedNot reportedSupported
Open weightsSupportedSupportedNot reported

Add another model

Search all models →