Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of Arcee AI: Trinity Large Thinking, Ideogram V4.5 Edit, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5
3 modelsarcee-aiArcee AI: Trinity Large ThinkingRemove ×ideogramIdeogram V4.5 EditRemove ×anthropicAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5Remove ×
What’s differentTrinity Large Thinking is a powerful open source reasoning model from the team at Arcee AI. It shows strong performance in PinchBench, agentic workloads, and reasoning tasks. Launch video:…Mask-guided edits with a high-precision mode that restores unchanged pixels; combines a source image with extra references.Tuned for quick iteration on scoped fixes and documents; Anthropic favors Opus 5.5 for open-ended work needing sustained judgment.
DateApr 1, 2026ListedSep 30, 2026ListedSep 28, 2026Released
Listed rate$0.25 in / $0.80 out/ 1M tokensArcee AI · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗arcee-aiSee provider quotes$2.00 in / $10.00 out/ 1M tokensAmazon Bedrock · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗amazon-bedrock
Provider endpoints2 endpoints →0 endpoints →11 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reportedNot reported56 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported1,817.26 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reportedNot reported1,837.82 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported71.77% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reportedNot reported63.64% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported61% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported54.96% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported25.8% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported31.43% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported32.3 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported82.67% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported82.46% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported85% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported83.6% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported84% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported94.7% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported78.8% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported59.5% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported91.6% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
Context window262.1K—1M
Max output80K—128K
Parameters———
Tool callingSupportedNot reportedSupported
Structured outputNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Image inputNot reportedNot reportedSupported
ReasoningSupportedNot reportedSupported
Prompt cachingSupportedNot reportedSupported
Open weightsSupportedNot reportedNot reported

Add another model

Search all models →