Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Pro, OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol, Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5
3 modelsxiaomiXiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-ProRemove ×openaiOpenAI: GPT-6.1 SolRemove ×anthropicAnthropic: Claude Opus 5.5Remove ×
What’s differentMiMo-V2.6-Pro is the flagship foundation model developed by Xiaomi. Built at a scale of over 1T parameters, it is designed to push the ceiling of capability for the most demanding...Requires Responses API for tools; offers Ultrafast inference with US or EU data residency.Always-on adaptive thinking defaults to medium effort; built for sustained work across large codebases and professional documents.
DateSep 21, 2026ReleasedSep 29, 2026ReleasedSep 22, 2026Released
Listed rate$0.387 in / $0.783 out/ 1M tokensDeepInfra · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗deepinfra/fp8 · quantization=fp8$1.00 in / $5.00 out/ 1M tokensOpenAI · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗openai/flex · tier=flex · prompt ≤ 272000 tokens$4.00 in / $20.00 out/ 1M tokensAmazon Bedrock · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗amazon-bedrock
Provider endpoints7 endpoints →10 endpoints →14 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.246.32 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result51.83 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result57.62 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.11,513.98 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result1,556.34 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result1,802.36 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.11,683.29 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result1,592.1 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result1,866.27 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection58.62% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result64.87% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result69.54% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗34.85% ↗Effort not specifiedHarness unreportedIndependent result56.06% ↗Effort: max · MaxHarness unreportedIndependent result59.6% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection60.88% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort not specifiedIndependent result54.17% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · MaxIndependent result66.9% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection49.35% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result52.92% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result61.35% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection19.2% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result31% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result26.2% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection26.57% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort not specifiedIndependent result31.71% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · MaxIndependent result31.71% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection8.38 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result41.53 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result46.42 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.186.33% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result83% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result84.67% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)74.87% ↗Effort: high · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result85.41% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result86.53% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)78.5% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result82.1% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result86.9% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)76.7% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result83.5% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result85% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)88% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result88% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result80% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)81.5% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result96% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result96.3% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)47.5% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result73% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result85% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)72.3% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result82.7% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result80.3% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)79.6% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result92.6% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result92.2% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
Context window1.1M1.1M1M
Max output131.1K128K128K
Parameters———
Tool callingSupportedSupportedSupported
Structured outputSupportedSupportedSupported
Image inputSupportedSupportedSupported
Audio inputSupportedNot reportedNot reported
Video inputSupportedNot reportedNot reported
ReasoningSupportedSupportedSupported
Prompt cachingSupportedSupportedSupported
Open weightsSupportedNot reportedNot reported

Add another model

Search all models →