Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5, OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol
3 modelsxiaomiXiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-ProRemove ×anthropicAnthropic: Claude Opus 5.5Remove ×openaiOpenAI: GPT-6.1 SolRemove ×
What’s differentMiMo-V2.6-Pro is the flagship foundation model developed by Xiaomi. Built at a scale of over 1T parameters, it is designed to push the ceiling of capability for the most demanding...Always-on adaptive thinking defaults to medium effort; built for sustained work across large codebases and professional documents.Requires Responses API for tools; offers Ultrafast inference with US or EU data residency.
DateSep 21, 2026ReleasedSep 22, 2026ReleasedSep 29, 2026Released
Listed rate$0.387 in / $0.783 out/ 1M tokensDeepInfra · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗deepinfra/fp8 · quantization=fp8$4.00 in / $20.00 out/ 1M tokensAmazon Bedrock · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗amazon-bedrock$1.00 in / $5.00 out/ 1M tokensOpenAI · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗openai/flex · tier=flex · prompt ≤ 272000 tokens
Provider endpoints7 endpoints →14 endpoints →10 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.246.32 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result57.62 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result51.83 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.11,513.98 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result1,802.36 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result1,556.34 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.11,683.29 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result1,866.27 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result1,592.1 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection58.62% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result69.54% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result64.87% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗34.85% ↗Effort not specifiedHarness unreportedIndependent result59.6% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackHarness unreportedIndependent result56.06% ↗Effort: max · MaxHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection60.88% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort not specifiedIndependent result66.9% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result54.17% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · MaxIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection49.35% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result61.35% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result52.92% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection19.2% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result26.2% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result31% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection26.57% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort not specifiedIndependent result31.71% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result31.71% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · MaxIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collection8.38 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result46.42 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result41.53 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.186.33% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result84.67% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result83% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)74.87% ↗Effort: high · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result86.53% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result85.41% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)78.5% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result86.9% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result82.1% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)76.7% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result85% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result83.5% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)88% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result80% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result88% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)81.5% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result96.3% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result96% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)47.5% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result85% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result73% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)72.3% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result80.3% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result82.7% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)79.6% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result92.2% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result92.6% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
Context window1.1M1M1.1M
Max output131.1K128K128K
Parameters———
Tool callingSupportedSupportedSupported
Structured outputSupportedSupportedSupported
Image inputSupportedSupportedSupported
Audio inputSupportedNot reportedNot reported
Video inputSupportedNot reportedNot reported
ReasoningSupportedSupportedSupported
Prompt cachingSupportedSupportedSupported
Open weightsSupportedNot reportedNot reported

Add another model

Search all models →