Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of MiniMax: MiniMax M3, Z.ai: GLM 5.1, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5
3 modelsminimaxMiniMax: MiniMax M3Remove ×z-aiZ.ai: GLM 5.1Remove ×anthropicAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5Remove ×
What’s differentMiniMax-M3 is a multimodal foundation model from MiniMax. It supports text, image, and video inputs with text output, a 1M-token context window, and is suited for long-horizon agentic work, coding,...GLM-5.1 delivers a major leap in coding capability, with particularly significant gains in handling long-horizon tasks. Unlike previous models built around minute-level interactions, GLM-5.1 can work…Tuned for quick iteration on scoped fixes and documents; Anthropic favors Opus 5.5 for open-ended work needing sustained judgment.
DateMay 31, 2026ListedApr 3, 2026ListedSep 28, 2026Released
Listed rate$0.224 in / $0.88 out/ 1M tokensDeepInfra · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗deepinfra/fp8/flex · tier=flex · quantization=fp8$0.966 in / $3.036 out/ 1M tokensExperiential · all routes ↗Standard list rate$2.00 in / $10.00 out/ 1M tokensAmazon Bedrock · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗amazon-bedrock
Provider endpoints15 endpoints →17 endpoints →11 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reportedNot reported56 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported1,817.26 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reportedNot reported1,837.82 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported71.77% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reportedNot reported63.64% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported61% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported54.96% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported25.8% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported31.43% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported32.3 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported82.67% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported82.46% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported85% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported83.6% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported84% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported94.7% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported78.8% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported59.5% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported91.6% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
Context window1M204.8K1M
Max output512K131.1K128K
Parameters———
Tool callingSupportedSupportedSupported
Structured outputSupportedSupportedSupported
Image inputSupportedNot reportedSupported
Video inputSupportedNot reportedNot reported
ReasoningSupportedSupportedSupported
Prompt cachingSupportedSupportedSupported
Open weightsSupportedSupportedNot reported

Add another model

Search all models →