Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of MiniMax-M3, StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash, Google: Gemini 4 Argon
3 modelsMiniMaxAIMiniMax-M3Remove ×stepfunStepFun: Step 3.7 FlashRemove ×googleGoogle: Gemini 4 ArgonRemove ×
What’s differentMiniMax-M3 is a native multimodal model with 1M context. It has ~428B parameters and ~23B activated parameters.Step 3.7 Flash is StepFun's latest high-efficiency multimodal Mixture-of-Experts model. It pairs a 196B-parameter language backbone with a vision encoder for native image and video understanding, activating…Long decode can use the unified 1M-token budget for output; reads video, audio and PDFs, with implicit-only caching.
DateJun 2, 2026ListedMay 23, 2026ListedSep 30, 2026Released
Listed rate$0.28 in / $1.10 out/ 1M tokensdeepinfra · via Hugging Face · all routes ↗$0.20 in / $1.15 out/ 1M tokensdeepinfra · via Hugging Face · all routes ↗$1.00 in / $5.00 out/ 1M tokensGoogle AI Studio · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗google-ai-studio/flex · tier=flex
Provider endpoints7 endpoints →5 endpoints →8 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reportedNot reported52.56 ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported1,485.76 ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reportedNot reported1,623.11 ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported77.51% ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reportedNot reported57.07% ↗Effort: high · HighHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported61.81% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: high · HighIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported57.09% ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported21.8% ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported27.14% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: high · HighIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported42.35 ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported79.67% ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported84.1% ↗Effort: high · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported73.7% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported83.1% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported92% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported89.7% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported69.9% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported85.2% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported95.1% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
Context window1M262.1K1M
Max output—230.4K943.7K
Parameters———
Tool callingSupportedSupportedSupported
Structured outputSupportedSupportedSupported
Image inputSupportedSupportedSupported
Audio inputNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Video inputNot reportedSupportedSupported
ReasoningNot reportedSupportedSupported
Prompt cachingNot reportedSupportedSupported
Open weightsSupportedSupportedNot reported

Add another model

Search all models →