Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of MiniMax-M3, MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1, Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5
3 modelsMiniMaxAIMiniMax-M3Remove ×minimaxMiniMax: MiniMax M2.1Remove ×anthropicAnthropic: Claude Opus 5.5Remove ×
What’s differentMiniMax-M3 is a native multimodal model with 1M context. It has ~428B parameters and ~23B activated parameters.MiniMax-M2.1 is a lightweight, state-of-the-art large language model optimized for coding, agentic workflows, and modern application development. With only 10 billion activated parameters, it delivers a…Always-on adaptive thinking defaults to medium effort; built for sustained work across large codebases and professional documents.
DateJun 2, 2026ListedDec 23, 2025ListedSep 22, 2026Released
Listed rate$0.28 in / $1.10 out/ 1M tokensdeepinfra · via Hugging Face · all routes ↗$0.30 in / $1.20 out/ 1M tokensMinimax · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗minimax/fp8 · quantization=fp8$4.00 in / $20.00 out/ 1M tokensAmazon Bedrock · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗amazon-bedrock
Provider endpoints7 endpoints →3 endpoints →14 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reportedNot reported57.62 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported1,802.99 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reportedNot reported1,866.27 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported69.54% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reportedNot reported59.6% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported66.9% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported61.35% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported26.2% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported31.71% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported46.42 ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported84.67% ↗Effort: max · Max, Default FallbackIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported86.53% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported86.9% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported85% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported80% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported96.3% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported85% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported80.3% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported92.2% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
Context window1M204.8K1M
Max output—131.1K128K
Parameters———
Tool callingSupportedSupportedSupported
Structured outputSupportedSupportedSupported
Image inputSupportedNot reportedSupported
ReasoningNot reportedSupportedSupported
Prompt cachingNot reportedSupportedSupported
Open weightsSupportedSupportedNot reported

Add another model

Search all models →