Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of MiniMax: MiniMax M2.1, Google: Gemini 4 Argon
2 modelsminimaxMiniMax: MiniMax M2.1Remove ×googleGoogle: Gemini 4 ArgonRemove ×
What’s differentMiniMax-M2.1 is a lightweight, state-of-the-art large language model optimized for coding, agentic workflows, and modern application development. With only 10 billion activated parameters, it delivers a…Long decode can use the unified 1M-token budget for output; reads video, audio and PDFs, with implicit-only caching.
DateDec 23, 2025ListedSep 30, 2026Released
Listed rate$0.30 in / $1.20 out/ 1M tokensMinimax · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗minimax/fp8 · quantization=fp8$1.00 in / $5.00 out/ 1M tokensGoogle AI Studio · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗google-ai-studio/flex · tier=flex
Provider endpoints3 endpoints →8 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reported52.56 ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reported1,486.44 ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reported1,623.99 ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported77.51% ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reported57.07% ↗Effort: high · HighHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported61.81% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: high · HighIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported57.09% ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported21.8% ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported27.14% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: high · HighIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported42.35 ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reported79.67% ↗Effort: high · HighIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported84.1% ↗Effort: high · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported73.7% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported83.1% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported92% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported89.7% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported69.9% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported85.2% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported95.1% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent result
Context window204.8K1M
Max output131.1K65.5K
Parameters——
Tool callingSupportedSupported
Structured outputSupportedSupported
Image inputNot reportedSupported
Audio inputNot reportedSupported
Video inputNot reportedSupported
ReasoningSupportedSupported
Prompt cachingSupportedSupported
Open weightsSupportedNot reported

Add another model

Search all models →