Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of MiniMax: MiniMax M2, MiniMax: MiniMax M3, Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B
3 modelsminimaxMiniMax: MiniMax M2Remove ×minimaxMiniMax: MiniMax M3Remove ×reflectionReflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23BRemove ×
What’s differentMiniMax-M2 is a compact, high-efficiency large language model optimized for end-to-end coding and agentic workflows. With 10 billion activated parameters (230 billion total), it delivers near-frontier…MiniMax-M3 is a multimodal foundation model from MiniMax. It supports text, image, and video inputs with text output, a 1M-token context window, and is suited for long-horizon agentic work, coding,...Apache-2.0 text model with 501B total and 23B active parameters; ships BF16, FP8 and NVFP4 weights.
DateOct 23, 2025ListedMay 31, 2026ListedOct 16, 2026Released
Listed rate$0.255 in / $1.02 out/ 1M tokensMinimax · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗minimax/fp8 · quantization=fp8$0.224 in / $0.88 out/ 1M tokensDeepInfra · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗deepinfra/fp8/flex · tier=flex · quantization=fp8$0.25 in / $1.00 out/ 1M tokensNebius · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗nebius/fp8 · quantization=fp8
Provider endpoints3 endpoints →15 endpoints →5 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reportedNot reported30.33 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported976.2 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reportedNot reported1,177.08 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported48.46% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reportedNot reported3.03% ↗Effort not specifiedHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported48.5% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort not specifiedIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported34.66% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported11.6% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported13.14% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort not specifiedIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported1.5 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported78% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported55.5% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported67.9% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported72.8% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported0% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported83.9% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported17.3% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported66.4% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported80.2% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
Context window204.8K1M1M
Max output131.1K512K943.7K
Parameters——501B
Tool callingSupportedSupportedSupported
Structured outputSupportedSupportedSupported
Image inputNot reportedSupportedNot reported
Video inputNot reportedSupportedNot reported
ReasoningSupportedSupportedSupported
Prompt cachingNot reportedSupportedSupported
Open weightsSupportedSupportedSupported

Add another model

Search all models →