Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of Seedance-2.0, Seed-2.0-code, Step-5-Preview
3 modelsByteDanceSeedance-2.0Remove ×ByteDanceSeed-2.0-codeRemove ×stepfun-aiStep-5-PreviewRemove ×
What’s differentA new-generation professional-grade multimodal video creation model developed, supports video generation with multimodal reference inputs including images, videos and audio.A coding model optimized for real-world development environments, with reliable tool use in common IDEs such as Claude Code. It delivers strong front-end performance and supports Skills.600B total and 27B active parameters; accepts images and video, with FP8 and BF16 weights for deployment.
DateApr 29, 2026ListedApr 29, 2026ListedSep 18, 2026Released
Listed rateSee provider quotes$0.50 in / $3.00 out/ 1M tokensDeepInfra · all routes ↗$1.00 in / $2.70 out/ 1M tokensDeepInfra · all routes ↗
Provider endpoints0 endpoints →1 endpoint →6 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reportedNot reported43.73 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported1,424.32 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reportedNot reported1,586.63 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported50.96% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reportedNot reported33.33% ↗Effort not specifiedHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported58.91% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort not specifiedIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported46.48% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported14.8% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported20.86% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort not specifiedIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported16.38 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported88.33% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported62.01% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported76.9% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported72.8% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported24% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported85.6% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported27.5% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported63.5% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported83.8% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
Context window—256K1M
Max output——64K
Parameters———
Tool callingNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Structured outputNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Image inputNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Video inputNot reportedNot reportedSupported
ReasoningNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Prompt cachingNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Open weightsNot reportedNot reportedSupported

Add another model

Search all models →