Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of Seed-2.0-code, Cohere: Command A+, Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B
3 modelsByteDanceSeed-2.0-codeRemove ×cohereCohere: Command A+Remove ×reflectionReflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23BRemove ×
What’s differentA coding model optimized for real-world development environments, with reliable tool use in common IDEs such as Claude Code. It delivers strong front-end performance and supports Skills.Command A+ is Cohere's flagship model for enterprise agentic workflows. It accepts text and image inputs with a 192K context window, supports native tool calling with strict tool schemas, structured...Apache-2.0 text model with 501B total and 23B active parameters; ships BF16, FP8 and NVFP4 weights.
DateApr 29, 2026ListedSep 22, 2026ListedOct 16, 2026Released
Listed rate$0.50 in / $3.00 out/ 1M tokensDeepInfra · all routes ↗$0.30 in / $1.50 out/ 1M tokensCohere · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗cohere$0.25 in / $1.00 out/ 1M tokensNebius · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗nebius/fp8 · quantization=fp8
Provider endpoints1 endpoint →2 endpoints →5 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reportedNot reported30.33 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported976.2 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reportedNot reported1,177.08 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported48.46% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reportedNot reported3.03% ↗Effort not specifiedHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported48.5% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort not specifiedIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported34.66% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported11.6% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported13.14% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort not specifiedIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported1.5 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported78% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported55.5% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported67.9% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported72.8% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported0% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported83.9% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported17.3% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported66.4% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported80.2% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
Context window256K192K1M
Max output—64K943.7K
Parameters——501B
Tool callingNot reportedSupportedSupported
Structured outputNot reportedSupportedSupported
Image inputNot reportedSupportedNot reported
ReasoningNot reportedSupportedSupported
Prompt cachingNot reportedSupportedSupported
Open weightsNot reportedNot reportedSupported

Add another model

Search all models →