Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of Seed-2.0-code, Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Pro, remove_background_guided
3 modelsByteDanceSeed-2.0-codeRemove ×xiaomiXiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-ProRemove ×Briaremove_background_guidedRemove ×
What’s differentA coding model optimized for real-world development environments, with reliable tool use in common IDEs such as Claude Code. It delivers strong front-end performance and supports Skills.MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the flagship foundation model developed by Xiaomi. Built at a scale of over 1T parameters, it is designed to push the ceiling of capability for the most demanding...Prompt-guided background removal by Bria: tell it what to keep or what to remove and get a clean cutout with true transparency, at the original resolution with the original pixels untouched. Trained…
DateApr 29, 2026ListedSep 21, 2026ReleasedOct 14, 2026Listed
Listed rate$0.50 in / $3.00 out/ 1M tokensDeepInfra · all routes ↗$0.43 in / $0.87 out/ 1M tokensDeepInfra · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗deepinfra/fp8 · quantization=fp8See provider quotes
Provider endpoints1 endpoint →6 endpoints →0 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reported46.32 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent resultNot reported
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reported1,514.66 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent resultNot reported
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reported1,684.34 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent resultNot reported
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported58.62% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent resultNot reported
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reported34.85% ↗Effort not specifiedHarness unreportedIndependent resultNot reported
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported60.88% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort not specifiedIndependent resultNot reported
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported49.35% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent resultNot reported
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported19.2% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent resultNot reported
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported26.57% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort not specifiedIndependent resultNot reported
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported8.38 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent resultNot reported
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reported86.33% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported74.87% ↗Effort: high · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported78.5% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported76.7% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported88% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported81.5% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported47.5% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported72.3% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported79.6% ↗Effort: high · single runIndependent resultNot reported
Context window256K1.1M—
Max output—131.1K—
Parameters———
Tool callingNot reportedSupportedNot reported
Structured outputNot reportedSupportedNot reported
Image inputNot reportedSupportedNot reported
Audio inputNot reportedSupportedNot reported
Video inputNot reportedSupportedNot reported
ReasoningNot reportedSupportedNot reported
Prompt cachingNot reportedSupportedNot reported
Open weightsNot reportedSupportedNot reported

Add another model

Search all models →