Side by side
See the difference.
Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.
Scroll to compare models →
| 3 models | topazTopaz Interpolate VideoRemove × | alibabaAlibaba: Wan 3.0Remove × | minimaxMiniMax H3 Max Text to VideoRemove × |
|---|---|---|---|
| What’s different | Professional frame interpolation powered by Topaz Labs. Apollo, Chronos and Aion retime footage up to 120 fps, from smooth motion to extreme slow motion. Best for fluid 60fps output and slow-motion effects. | Can choose clip duration from the prompt; toggle generated audio, prompt expansion and extra thinking before rendering. | Uses native 480P/768P generation or 1080P latent refinement; supports supplied soundtracks and selectable prompt expansion. |
| Date | Aug 11, 2026Listed | Aug 19, 2026Released | Aug 26, 2026Released |
API prices USD · provider configuration shown below | |||
| Listed rate | See provider quotes | $0.05/ secondDeepInfra · all routes ↗480P · $ cost per second · output second | See provider quotes |
| Provider endpoints | 0 endpoints → | 2 endpoints → | 0 endpoints → |
Benchmarks Each result retains its evaluation configuration | |||
| AA Video + Audio ↗2.1 | Not reported | 1,173.29 ↗Text-to-video · audio evaluated · all categoriesIndependent result95% CI 1,157.29–1,189.29 · n=5,682 | 1,155.56 ↗Text-to-video · audio evaluated · all categoriesIndependent result95% CI 1,139.56–1,171.56 · n=5,440 |
| AA Video Silent ↗2.1 | Not reported | 1,134.11 ↗Text-to-video · silent evaluation · all categoriesIndependent result95% CI 1,116.11–1,152.11 · n=4,042 | 1,116.88 ↗Text-to-video · silent evaluation · all categoriesIndependent result95% CI 1,099.88–1,133.88 · n=5,883 |
Specifications | |||
| Context window | — | — | — |
| Max output | — | — | — |
| Parameters | — | — | — |
| Structured output | Not reported | Supported | Not reported |
| Image input | Not reported | Supported | Not reported |
| Audio input | Not reported | Supported | Not reported |
| Video input | Not reported | Supported | Not reported |