Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of Meta Muse Image Edit, Pixelcut Looping Video, Google: Nano Banana 2.1
3 modelsmetaMeta Muse Image EditRemove ×pixelcutPixelcut Looping VideoRemove ×googleGoogle: Nano Banana 2.1Remove ×
What’s differentMeta's Muse Image model does precise edits that change only what you ask, stay coherent across turns, and compose from multiple reference images.Turns one product photo into a loop that ends on its starting frame, with a locked camera and subtle motion or a full spin.Nano Banana 2.1 (Gemini Nano Banana 2.1) is Google's image generation and editing model on the Flash tier, succeeding Nano Banana 2 and Nano Banana Pro. It improves product recontextualization,...
DateAug 21, 2026ListedSep 29, 2026ListedOct 6, 2026Released
Listed rate$0.01/ imagefal · all routes ↗See provider quotes

$30.00/ 1M output tokens

Google AI Studio · via OpenRouter · Conditional · Output only

Provider endpoints1 endpoint →0 endpoints →2 endpoints →
AA Image ↗2.1Not reportedNot reported1,175.56 ↗Text-to-image · all categoriesIndependent result95% CI 1,163.56–1,187.56 · n=6,210
Context window——65.5K
Max output——59K
Parameters———
Tool callingNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Structured outputNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Image inputNot reportedNot reportedSupported
ReasoningNot reportedNot reportedSupported

Add another model

Search all models →