Side by side
See the difference.
Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.
Scroll to compare models →
| 3 models | metaMeta Muse Image EditRemove × | ideogramIdeogram V4.5 Text to ImageRemove × | recraftRecraft V4.1 Flash Text to ImageRemove × |
|---|---|---|---|
| What’s different | Meta's Muse Image model does precise edits that change only what you ask, stay coherent across turns, and compose from multiple reference images. | Generate high-quality images, posters, and logos with Ideogram 4.5, with accurate text rendering and low, medium, or high quality tiers. | Supply preferred RGB palette colors and a background color directly, alongside the text prompt and custom image dimensions. |
| Date | Aug 21, 2026Listed | Sep 30, 2026Released | Sep 23, 2026Released |
API prices USD · provider configuration shown below | |||
| Listed rate | $0.01/ imagefal · all routes ↗ | See provider quotes | $0.007/ imagefal · all routes ↗ |
| Provider endpoints | 1 endpoint → | 1 endpoint → | 2 endpoints → |
Benchmarks Each result retains its evaluation configuration | |||
| AA Image ↗2.1 | Not reported | 1,015.07 ↗Text-to-image · all categories · quality=highIndependent result95% CI 1,000.07–1,030.07 · n=2,888 | 949.34 ↗Text-to-image · all categoriesIndependent result95% CI 937.34–961.34 · n=5,770 |
Specifications | |||
| Context window | — | — | 65.5K |
| Max output | — | — | 59K |
| Parameters | — | — | — |