Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of text-embedding-3-large, Reflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23B, embeddinggemma-2
3 modelsUnknowntext-embedding-3-largeRemove ×reflectionReflection: Beam 1.0 501B A23BRemove ×googleembeddinggemma-2Remove ×
What’s different8.2K contextApache-2.0 text model with 501B total and 23B active parameters; ships BF16, FP8 and NVFP4 weights.EmbeddingGemma 2 is a 740M parameter multimodal embedding model from Google DeepMind that maps text (incl. code), images, video and audio, alone or interleaved, into a single 768-dimensional vector space,…
DateOct 16, 2026DiscoveredOct 16, 2026ReleasedOct 8, 2026Listed
Listed rate$0.13 in / $0.00 out/ 1M tokensExperiential · all routes ↗Standard list rate$0.25 in / $1.00 out/ 1M tokensNebius · via OpenRouter · all routes ↗nebius/fp8 · quantization=fp8See provider quotes
Provider endpoints1 endpoint →5 endpoints →0 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reported30.33 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent resultNot reported
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reported976.2 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent resultNot reported
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reported1,177.08 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent resultNot reported
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported48.46% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent resultNot reported
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reported3.03% ↗Effort not specifiedHarness unreportedIndependent resultNot reported
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported48.5% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort not specifiedIndependent resultNot reported
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported34.66% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent resultNot reported
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported11.6% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent resultNot reported
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported13.14% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort not specifiedIndependent resultNot reported
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reported1.5 ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent resultNot reported
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reported78% ↗Effort not specifiedIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported55.5% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported67.9% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported72.8% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported0% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported83.9% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported17.3% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported66.4% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent resultNot reported
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reported80.2% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent resultNot reported
Context window8.2K1M8.2K
Max output—943.7K—
Parameters—501B—
Tool callingNot reportedSupportedNot reported
Structured outputNot reportedSupportedNot reported
ReasoningNot reportedSupportedNot reported
Prompt cachingNot reportedSupportedNot reported
Open weightsNot reportedSupportedNot reported

Add another model

Search all models →