Side by side

See the difference.

Scores, capabilities and costs for the models you’re considering.

Scroll to compare models →

Comparison of clef, embeddinggemma-2, OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol
3 modelsUnknownclefRemove ×googleembeddinggemma-2Remove ×openaiOpenAI: GPT-6.1 SolRemove ×
What’s different65.5K contextEmbeddingGemma 2 is a 740M parameter multimodal embedding model from Google DeepMind that maps text (incl. code), images, video and audio, alone or interleaved, into a single 768-dimensional vector space,…Requires Responses API for tools; offers Ultrafast inference with US or EU data residency.
DateOct 16, 2026DiscoveredOct 8, 2026ListedSep 29, 2026Released
Listed rate$0.24 in / $0.00 out/ 1M tokensExperiential · all routes ↗Standard list rateSee provider quotes$2.00 in / $10.00 out/ 1M tokensExperiential · all routes ↗Standard list rate
Provider endpoints1 endpoint →0 endpoints →10 endpoints →
AA Intelligence ↗4.3.2Not reportedNot reported51.83 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
AA-Briefcase ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported1,557 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
GDPval-AA ↗2.1Not reportedNot reported1,593.85 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
AutomationBench-AA ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported64.87% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · AA ↗Not reportedNot reported56.06% ↗Effort: max · MaxHarness unreportedIndependent result
SciCode ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported54.17% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · MaxIndependent result
Humanity’s Last Exam ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported52.92% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
GDP.pdf ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported31% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
CritPt ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported31.71% ↗AA · Under reviewEffort: max · MaxIndependent result
AA-Omniscience ↗AA Index 4.3.2 collectionNot reportedNot reported41.53 ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
AA-LCR ↗1.1Not reportedNot reported83% ↗Effort: max · MaxIndependent result
LiveBench ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported85.41% ↗Effort: max · single run · equal mean of 7 suitesIndependent result
LiveBench Design ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported82.1% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Research ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported83.5% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Browser Use ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported88% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Coding ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported96% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Agentic ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported73% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Data Analysis ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported82.7% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
LiveBench Reasoning ↗2.0 · 2026-10-14 (dataset 2026-09-02)Not reportedNot reported92.6% ↗Effort: max · single runIndependent result
Context window65.5K8.2K1.1M
Max output——128K
Parameters———
Tool callingNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Structured outputNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Image inputNot reportedNot reportedSupported
ReasoningNot reportedNot reportedSupported
Prompt cachingNot reportedNot reportedSupported

Add another model

Search all models →